Mailbag: Which programs are best positioned to capitalize on rev-share?
Plus: Questions on Western Michigan, the Spengler Cup, NPI, and an independent conference?
Which programs are best positioned to capitalize on revenue-sharing in college hockey? That’s the headline topic leading off this week’s mailbag.
Other questions we tackle in today’s issue (#615) include:
— Are some teams dissuading players from participating in the Spengler Cup?
— How does the NPI stack up against the Pairwise?
— Is Western Michigan due for some positive regression?
— Will the independents form their own conference once another team joins the fold?
Plus, we close with a notebook featuring more on Providence’s revenue-sharing potential, the latest developments on the SCORE Act, and a handful of key injury updates.
If you have ideas for a future newsletter, tips you want to share, mailbag submissions, or if you want to sponsor a future newsletter, please email mike@collegehockeyinsider.com.
I’m also @MikeMcMahonCHN on Twitter.
Thank you to our premium subscribers for their support of independent sports media!
Now, onto today’s newsletter …
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to College Hockey Insider by Mike McMahon to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.